The IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group's website (www.catsg.org) presents each month a different cat conservation project. Members of the Cat Specialist Group are encouraged to submit a short description of interesting projects For
application use this standardised form
(an editable word document)
|
|
Repaint the Stripes: Research-based
Sumatran Tiger Conservation in a Multi-use Landscape |
|

A tiger strides on an
inundated peat swamp forest in Kerumutan, Riau (Photo WWF_PHKA_VATech/Sunarto). |
The island of
Sumatra, Indonesia, is home to one of the most threatened subspecies of tigers
surviving in the wild: Panthera tigris sumatrae. As part of WWF’s intervention and
my Virginia Tech’s Student Research in Riau Province, this project aims to
deliver improved knowledge of the tiger’s ecology, which will inform land use
and conservation management decisions, and improved security for tigers. |
|
Sunarto
has started to focus on
cat study and conservation in 2004. At that time, he joined WWF Indonesia as a
wildlife biologist. He is also enrolled
as a PhD student at Virginia Tech, USA, studying the ecology of Sumatran tigers
in the Riau Landscape. Previously, he worked for Conservation International,
Wildlife Conservation Society as well as an ICDP Project. With WCS, he lead a
team to build and manage the Way Canguk Research Station in BBS National Park.
Sunarto is a member of the Cat SG since 2008.
s.sunarto@yahoo.com
submitted:
March 2008
|

Setting up a camera
trap in the Tesso Nilo forest (Photo WWF/Sunarto). |
Background
Numbers of tigers in Sumatra are believed to have
been constantly declining over the last decades. The decline is owing to
habitat loss, poaching, and retaliation killings. Sumatran forests, the main habitat for the tiger, have continually
been converted to large-scale industrial and agricultural plantations; mainly
grow oil palm and acacia trees. Meanwhile, tigers are poached for the
international wildlife trade and are often captured after coming into conflict
with people.
Riau is the largest province
in Sumatra which potentially holds the highest number of Sumatran tigers. It contains several Tiger Conservation
Landscapes under different categories (Sanderson et al. 2006). Until the time this project was implemented,
however, tiger distribution in the area has not been properly surveyed or
mapped. Most information available on tigers in Riau stemmed only from
secondary sources generally associated with tiger poaching or conflict with
people. Accurate information on tiger
presence and distribution in Riau is critical to guiding land-use planning by the
governments and private companies which hold large estates of forestland.
To
secure tiger populations in the Landscape, the following actions are required:
1.
Identification of areas still
holding tigers
2.
Securing current tiger and
prey numbers in core areas through
a. Protected
area establishment and effective management thereof
b. Monitoring
of tiger and prey numbers to facilitate adaptive management
3.
Landscape
conservation to ensure habitat preservation and connectivity through
a.
Increased
awareness of the local communities and decision makers
b.
Increased
effectiveness of enforcement efforts
c.
Increased national and
local stakeholder support |
|

Staff
capacity building in field research data
management (Photo Sunarto).
|
|
My project
focuses on:
1.
Identifying areas still holding tigers,
estimate the density in major habitats, and predict the probability of
occurrence across the landscape.
2. Disseminating research findings for habitat
protection, management and restoration, including the development of new
protected areas and improved management of tiger habitats.
3.
Building local capacity on
tiger conservation.
|
|
Methods To reveal the ecological characteristics of tigers in
the landscape we used a variety of field techniques which include interviews
and ad-hoc surveys to document tiger presence, camera trapping for abundance
estimation, and detection-non detection/occupancy estimation to predict the
occurrence of tigers.
Identifying
areas still holding tigers
Identification of tiger
presence in the landscape involved stages of activities. First, potential habitats for tigers are
identified, mainly based on the land cover.
We considered the remaining forest as the potential habitat. Areas of large forest patches are the target
area where tiger presence is to be confirmed.
We used different approaches in gathering information on tiger presence
which include interviewing authorities and local people, direct survey for
tiger sign, as well as camera trapping and other systematic samplings such as
occupancy survey. |
|

Map
of The Tesso Nilo-Bukit Tigapuluh Conservation Landscape in Southern Riau
Province, Sumatra. |
|
Estimating the abundance of tigers using camera traps
We found that in our study
area camera traps are only effective for use in forested areas. This was due to
high human activities and low probability to capture wildlife in areas outside
of forests. We placed 13 equally-spaced
possible camera trap sampling blocks, each measuring ca. 128 km2 in
the ca. 17,000 km2 forests in the Tesso Nilo-Bukit Tigapuluh
Conservation Landscape (see map).
To begin with, we selected 4 sampling blocks,
representing 3 major habitat types in the landscape, to be covered in the first
two year. We covered each sampling blocks with +/- 40 camera traps placed in
pairs in about 20 sites. Photographic data generated from camera trapping were
mainly used to estimate the density of naturally marked animals such as the
tiger, using capture-mark-recapture techniques. For animals which have no natural marking individually, we
estimate the relative abundance based on the photographic capture rates.
To estimate the relative
abundance of tigers and their prey outside of forest habitat, we used another
technique such as the detection-non detection or occupancy survey |
|
Estimating site occupancy to predict the probability
of occurrence for tigers and their prey
We conducted this survey as part of a larger
initiative to study the tiger and other large mammals in Sumatra. For that, we have adjusted our sampling
techniques to comply with the common method. We agreed to use a common grid
size of 17x17 km. We designed the
sampling technique in such a way that we will be able to analyze the resulting
data for both habitat use and occupancy estimations. For the first year of
implementing this technique, we selected 20 (twenty) 17x17 km grids using stratified
random sampling. WWF (Setiabudi and Budiman 2005) has classified the landscape
according to the landcover types which we used to stratify the sampling. The
number of 17x17 grids selected was proportionate to the area represented by the
respective land cover type in the landscape.
We aimed to set for 40 ‘transects’ in each of 17x17 km
grid. In each grid, observations were
conducted in segmented transects. Each ‘transect’ (1000 meter) was divided into
ten segments of 100 meter each. Data
collection for signs of target animals and environmental variables was
conducted at every segment.
We plan to analyze the data at two levels. At the
island-wide level, we will combine our data with other parties. For the island
or larger landscape level, we will treat the 17x17 grid as the ‘site’, while
each 1 km transect as a sampling occasion. At the smaller area level, we will treat
each 1 km transect as the ‘site’ and the 100 meter segments as ‘occasions’. The
larger scale analysis is expected to reveal the ‘true occupancy’ for tigers,
while smaller scale can be both tiger’s ‘habitat use’ and ‘true occupancy’ for
smaller animals.
|
|
Kusdianto
and Harry, tiger research team doing the occupancy survey
(Photo Sunarto).
|
|
To minimize potential bias,
we randomly selected a 2x2 km cell within each 17x17km grid for each team to
include in their route of observation transects. If there is more than one team
covering the same 17x17 km grids we selected a random cell for each team. To
begin a new transect a random direction with a distance of 200 meter from the
latest position (e.g. dropping point) or previous transect, was selected.
Although the transect started at a random point, the team surveyed areas deemed
to have the highest likelihood of finding animal’s sign. We intensively
searched for tiger and prey sign in areas where we are most likely to detect
such sign, such as on forest trails, sand beds, and river banks.
|
|
Disseminating research
findings for habitat protection and management We used the research findings to promote the species
conservation through better policy, improved awareness, as well as habitat
protection and management. To make sure
the policy, we supported the development of national conservation strategy and
action plan for the tiger. We also advocated the development of
human-tiger conflict mitigation protocols. In the development of both documents, our hands-on experiences are
used to enrich the document. |
|
Based on the information on tiger presence, we
promoted the development, expansion as well as better management of the
protected areas. For example, we
promoted the expansion of Bukit Tigapuluh National Park and Tesso Nilo National
Park to make sure long-term viability of the tiger which otherwise will have no
adequate habitat or population to thrive over long-term.
To promote better practices
of the private sectors, particularly those who manage lands in the around tiger
habitat, we have designed our research and will use the results as a base to
develop a guideline to improve the management practices to be more friendly and
supportive to tiger conservation. |
|

We
supported the Government led develop- ment
of conservation strategy for Sumatran tiger
(Photo Sunarto). |
|

Cobar
Hutajulu_local MS student setting up a camera trap (Photo
Sunarto)
|
|
Building local
capacity on tiger conservation
The project aims to
build local capacity on tiger conser- vation, specifically in conducted
scientific research, as an integral part the program’s strategy. The capacity building program includes the
support of the project for the team member to pursue higher education at a PhD
level (Sunarto, Virginia Teach) and an MS Student (Maju B. Hutajulu, University
of Indonesia). In addition, we also
created an assistantship scheme for local students to conduct various research
related to tiger conservation. We are
now financially supporting 10 local students from various higher educational
institutions to conduct research on tiger-related issues. The students will use the research as their
final thesis. Furthermore, to promote
involvement of local students, we also promote the involvement of those who are
interested in joining our field activities as volunteers. Currently we have two local students involved
as volunteers who join in the field surveys. |
|
Results
Camera Trapping: Abundance
estimation
We have systematically
sampled using camera traps, up to June 2007, not less than 86 sites located in
4 sampling blocks that represent 3 major habitat types in the landscape.
Around 25 percent of the sites, located in Tesso Nilo National Park, were
sampled twice, which will enable temporal comparison as a means of biodiversity
monitoring. Until early 2007, up to
which field data were already properly compiled, we accumulated 13,400 camera
trap nights, covered 2,123 km2 of effective sampling area, and obtained 58
independent tiger pictures.
We photographed 10
individual tigers under CMR protocols, plus 4 individuals during ad hoc camera
trappings. These results constitute the
first scientifically based evidence of tiger presence in 4 key forest blocks in
Southern Riau. Undeniable evidence of
tiger presence serves as an important tool for advocacy to prevent this habitat
from being converted. |
 The first nine individuals of tigers photographed in the Landscape (Photo
WWF-
PHKA-VT/Sunarto).
|
|
Based on our limited
sample, having considered the effective sampling areas, we documented that the highest
density of adult tigers (individuals/100 km2) was estimated from KRWR (wet flat
forests, 1.27 to 5.5), followed by RBWR (hilly forests, 0.92 to 4.03), and TNNP
(dry flat forests, 0.64 to 1.4). When
we used a different approach of estimating density based on the capture rate
(Relative Abundance Index, O’Brien et al. 2003),
however, the results were not consistent. With this approach, TNNP was ranked highest with estimate density
of 1.392 individual per 100 km2, followed by KRWR (0.055), and RBWR (0.001).
The estimates are not robust, hence we considered this provisional. More samples will probably overcome this
constraint. |
|

An industrial
plantation grows acacia trees adjacent to a tiger reserve: we are working to
promote better management practices so that tigers will have wider space in
which to roam (Photo Sunarto). |
Tiger Distribution Mapping
All forest blocks in TNBTCL
provide habitat for tigers. We recorded
tiger presence in the four major forest blocks, each of which measured at least
100,000 ha. We produced a map of the
landscape showing the different probability that tigers occur in a given
point. From the map, we identified six
major areas with high probability of tiger occurrence in Southern Riau. Those include Bukit Bungkuk, Rimbang Baling,
Tesso Nilo, Bukit Tigapuluh, Kerumutan, and Kampar Peninsula. What’s striking from the result of this
exercise is the fact that many areas important for tiger conservation are not
protected. In addition to a good
management of the protected areas, more intensive works to promote the
protection of those areas are central in the long-term conservation of the
tigers in the landscape.
Promoting Private Sectors’
Better Management Practices (BMP)
We are in the process of
developing BMP guidelines that will be used by timber and palm oil plantations
to promote tiger conservation.
|
|
References
O'Brien, T. G., M. F. Kinnaird, and H. T. Wibisono. 2003.
Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation 2003 131–139.
Sanderson, E., J. Forrest,
C. Loucks, J. Ginsberg, E. Dinerstein, J. Seidensticker, P. Leimgruber, M.
Songer, A. Heydlauff, T. O’Brien, G. Bryja, S. Klenzendorf, and E.
Wikramanayake. 2006. Setting Priorities for the Conservation and Recovery of
Wild Tigers: 2005-2015. WCS, WWF, Smithsonian, and NFWF-STF.
Setiabudi, A. Budiman, and M. Stuewe. 2005.
Analysis of 2000-2004 Land Use Dynamics in the Tesso Nilo - Bukit Tiga Puluh
Conservation Landscape, Riau, Sumatra. Yayasan WWF. |
|
|
| |
Project Information
|
| |
Duration:
|
December 2004 – ongoing
| |
Location (see map):
|
Sothern Riau Landscape,
Sumatra | |
Sponsor(s):
|
STF/NFWF, USFWS,
Hurvis Family, WWF Network | |
Project address:
|
WWF Indonesia - Riau Program Tiger Research Unit
Komplex Perkantoran Grand
Sudirman, Blok B-1
Jl. Datuk Setia Maharaja,
Pekanbaru - Riau Indonesia 28282
Phone : (0761) 855006, Fax
: (0761) 35323a | |
Project leader:
|
Scientific Advisors:
Dr. Sybille Klenzendorf, Director of Species
Conservation, WWF-US
Dr. Marcella Kelly, Assistant Professor, Virginia
Tech
Programatic Advisors:
Dr. Hadi S. Alikodra, Director of Species
Conservation, WWF Indonesia
Dudi Rufendi, Manager, Riau
Conservation Program, WWF Indonesia
Research Coordinator
Sunarto, Survey and Monitoring Coordinator, WWF
Indonesia & PhD Student, Virginia Tech
Email: s.sunarto@yahoo.com |
|
Project website
|
www.wwf.or.id/tessonilo
|
Download as PDF
|