|
Population Status Global: Category 5(A) Regional: Category 4 IUCN: Not Listed
In the early 1980s, state wildlife authorities estimated the total US bobcat population
to range between 725,000 to 1 million adult animals (Govt. of US 1983a). Bobcats
have historically been less abundant in the east-central US, owing to high human
population density and intensive, large-scale agriculture (Peterson and Downing
1952). Bobcats are also considered to be generally widespread and healthy in the
Canadian (Govt. of Canada 1983) and Mexican (Govt. of US 1992, M. Aranda in
litt. 1993) parts of their range, although hunting and trapping may have led to
some local depletions (González and Leal 1984, G. Mowat in litt. 1993).
L. rufus escuinapae (Allen 1903), the southernmost race found in Mexico, was
listed on CITES Appendix I in 1973 for reasons that are not now clear. Craniometric
studies have indicated that is is not actually a valid subspecies (Samson 1979),
and on these grounds it was downlisted to Appendix II in 1992. The Mexican government
has described numbers of bobcat in the country as "adequate" (Govt. of US 1983a,
1992).
Reported bobcat densities range from 1-38 resident adults per 25
km2 (summarized in McCord and Cardoza 1982,
Anderson 1987; Koehler and Hornocker 1989). The south-eastern US and California
coastal regions appear to support the most dense populations, probably due to high
environmental productivity. Reduced density is associated with harsher environments,
such as south-western deserts and the more northern portions of the bobcat’s range
(summarized in Rolley 1987). Mean home range estimates vary from 0.6-326
km2 in size (summarized in Anderson 1987),
and tend to be larger in the north. For example, Berg (1979) found male ranges
averaged 62 km2 in Minnesota, whereas male ranges in
Alabama averaged 2.6 km2 (Miller and Speake
1979). Male home ranges are generally 2-3 times larger than female ranges and
overlap those of several females. Male ranges overlap partially with those of other
males, while female ranges are more exclusive. |
© 1996 IUCN - The World Conservation Union